💬
🤖
AI Support
24/7 online · instant AI reply
✕
← Back
42m ago · CoinTelegraph

Crypto PAC pours $362K into California race voters essentially decided in August

A Fairshake affiliate is supporting incumbent Aisha Wahab through ads in November, but the congresswoman already won a special election in the district. Protect Progress, an affiliate of the cryptocurrency-aligned Fairshake super political action committee (PAC), reported spending $362,000 on ads to support a Democrat in California’s 14th congressional district, just weeks after she won a special election against the same opponent. According to a Sunday filing with the US Federal Election Commission (FEC), Protect Progress >reported spending $362,000 on media supporting incumbent Democrat Aisha Wahab in the Bay Area district against her fellow party member, Melissa Hernandez. Wahab defeated Hernandez in an Aug. 18 special election with more than 53% of the vote, raising questions about why the cryptocurrency industry-aligned PAC is supporting her in the 2026 midterms. Notably, both Wahab and Hernandez were ranked as “strongly supports crypto” after they went on the record with the digital asset organization Stand With Crypto to complete questionnaires ahead of the August special election. That election was used to determine who would replace Democrat Eric Swalwell for the remainder of his term, ending January 2027. Swalwell resigned in April amid sexual assault allegations. Fairshake launched in 2023, backed largely by contributions from Coinbase, Ripple Labs and Andreessen Horowitz. Since the 2024 US elections, the Super PAC has spent tens of millions of dollars on candidates the group considers “pro-crypto” in efforts to fill Congress with lawmakers more likely to support policies favorable to the digital asset industry. Related: Ex-Trump crypto adviser profited after helping pass stablecoin bill: WSJ In an Oct. 7 debate, Wahab >signaled that she opposed Hernandez for not denouncing expenditures from corporate PACs aligned with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), adding that the spending “really deteriorated our democracy.” Cointelegraph reached out to both the Hernandez and Wahab campaigns, and Fairshake for comment on the spending but did not receive immediate responses. One notable change between the August special election and the November midterms will be the boundaries of California’s 14th district. The current boundaries, which include parts of San Francisco’s East Bay, will be expanded in accordance with the 2025 passage of the state’s Proposition 50, requiring new maps for the midterm elections. The crypto PAC reported in January that it

📌 Recommended Exchanges

OKX | Binance | Bybit | Bitget | Gate.io


AI Analysis:

🦊 Nova's Take Protect Progress burning $362K on a race Wahab already won in August looks less like persuasion and more like relationship-building with a likely future incumbent. It signals crypto PACs are playing long-game political capital rather than chasing electoral outcomes. 📊 Market Impact Minimal near-term price impact — this is inside-baseball politics, not a liquidity or policy catalyst. Mid-term, continued Fairshake spending builds goodwill that could ease future regulatory headwinds for the sector. 💡 Trading Advice Don't trade this headline; political spend is noise on the chart. Treat sustained PAC activity as a slow-burn positive for regulatory sentiment, not a trigger for BTC or ETH positioning. *Not financial advice — manage your risk.* 🦊

Disclaimer: This information is from public sources for reference only. Traceless does not guarantee accuracy.

💬 0
🏪 Strategies

💬 Comments

🔑 Login to leave a comment
No comments yet. Be the first!